National Curricular Parameters

Of this form we half believe to be umimportante literature for the agreement of the geographic space as construohistrica. Also other languages come being used for the Geografiana search on the construction organization of the geographic space. In the ltimosanos Geography comes if using of the arts, the cinema, literature comoinstrumento of analysis> of the geographic space. On the use of the art and daliteratura in Geography Carlos (2002; p. 175 – 176) declare: Geography started to reflect on the impensvel, until bempouco time. Get all the facts for a more clear viewpoint with Southwest Airlines.

Today, many works if lean over on the party, music, aliteratura, the cinema, placing in scene the relation between geography and the art, oque comes opening many possibilities of research. However the use of these resources in the majority of vezesest related specifically to the content of geography being dissociado deoutras you discipline. The use of the art, literature, music and the produocinematogrfica also becomes gift in others disciplines, then because esteuso is not carried through in a way that integrates the different areas doconhecimento in a boarding to interdisciplinar. The National Curricular Parameters clarify that conceptual hdiferena between interdisciplinaridade and transversalidade. Ainterdisciplinaridade mentions a epistemolgica boarding to it of objects doconhecimento – the vision questions compartimentada to discipline of the sobrea reality which the school as is known, historically consisted. Relate in such a way to a relation enters disciplines; while the dizrespeito transversalidade mainly to the didactic version, the possibility of if establishing, in practical the educative one, a relation between learning in the deconhecimentos reality and of the reality theoretically systemize and the questions of the real life. As Bovo (s/d, p.2) the interdisciplinaridade appeared nofinal of century XIX as reply the spalling of science proposals pelopositivismo, therefore this was subdivides giving to origin the diverse ones disciplines. Comos reducionismos caused for the positivismo the interdisciplinaridade appeared fimde to reestablish a dialogue enters the diverse areas of the scientific knowledge.


Outrossim, the understanding of these Inter-relations entresociedade versus landscape is a central vector to choose ours corpode investigations concerning the possibilities and restrictions of human comogrupos (with different strategies/survival choices esubsistncia, adaptability symbolic-cultural universe), was semovendo, assuming themselves and defining its partner-cultural space, since ' ' To understand the Geography and the Environment of one determined area is, thus, umimportante aspect of the archaeological research. It allows, outrossim, that olharisolado in the past can be inserted in an ample context and melhorcompreensvel' ' (Moral, 1999, P. 32), therefore: ' ' (…) to understand entornode ambientao where if it inserts an archaeological small farm, constructed and reconstrudoem function of the use and the occupation of the ground, aid in the task to understand vidapregressa and cultura' ' (Moral, 1999, P. 32). In all the case, still the North American naacademia trend is very current the use of the concept of Landscape Ecology and suasramificaes (evolutionary ecology, forangig ecology, behavioral ecology, for example), as well as the known source as Evolutionary Archaeology, that as Kelly says respect to ' ' an evolutionary science concerned withthe diffetential persistence of variability in behavior over teams (Kelly, 2000, P.

64). Thick way, the evolutivo ecological approach has primordial comopreocupao the understanding of the space use of the environment for diferentesorganismos. As the ambient factors and the 0 variable that affect the sucessoevolutivo of definitive species they are distributed in heterogenia way napaisagem, these organisms must be moved through these spaces to make usoda energy and nutrients, in a definite continuous as salvatory movements (Stafford & Hajic, 1992, p.139). Thus, many archaeologists had assumen of these concepts emsuas research for understanding of mobility, technological organization and aprpria variability of the artefatuais sets of prehistoric groups, leaving of the estimated one that the mobility standard is intrinsecamenterelacionado to the component elements of the landscape, that include plants, community of animals, hdricos temperature, humidity, ground, resources etc.