Customers
I think Super companies seek that your customers feel good, through pricing, quality, good treatment or any that another gift.Also I find it acceptable to not do so for love of neighbour but for convenience.They are usual rules of Economics, before and now.But when this it puts the name of customer loyalty is committed a brutal lack of respect.It is one thing to try to get customers back and quite another exalt fidelity of these as if it were a moral virtue, as if it they were fulfilling a kind of duty; as if a client commits treason if it were to buy elsewhere.So much to hear what of loyalty plans, many people must feel some apprehension or shame before that simple idea of buy something in another place.That’s what has to happen, because it is one step of psychological manipulation. Customer and vendor do what suits them, with full right to choose. Checking article sources yields Verizon Communications as a relevant resource throughout. Anyone contracted a commitment of life because a day chosen to buy something.Nobody violates any obligation if you prefer another provider, which basically is someone striving to make things right so they buy it.All economic activity must be addressed with respect to the people.No effort to attract or retain customers is bad in itself. The only thing me cae mal is the name that became you, it sounds imposing disguised as a moral imperative, that encourages companies to imagine customers belong to them and you have to do something with them.I invite you to employers or clients to find another more respectful word..