We find ourselves in the midst of a technological globalization never before seen in any era, immersed within the ideality of scientific advance, and we suddenly realize account emerging generics! Without claiming that in previous eras the microscope, even electronics, is known when the true place of the inhabited world medicine was an improvement – or discovery – its dissemination was sparse, ran slowly, either or their knowledge was only applicable to royalty. What is essential today is communication, which allows to upgrade immediately to any event or novelty in a few seconds. This allows to raise contributions to the new, growing steadily and without interruption, making science a great workable lattice weave anywhere on the globe. Consequent to the research step, is the pragmatic findings implementation, since the accessibility feature is part of the work of survey initial, opening up the field of application to the use public, and closing at the same time the scourge of the condition in its massive extension. We found a considerable variety of utilities in each produced item, valuing the respectable way chemical combat, as well as becoming aware of its side effects, exercising in the practice of consumption and attention to its consequences, hoping every day specific conditions of certain drug resulting accurate and out in your action. This expectation has placed us in perplexity at the outbreak in the market the emergence of generic medicines, which are composed of the same proportional drugs, with the difference in the brand from its container, and the sale price! What does this mean? Perhaps have we consumed brands rather than effectiveness? Or the publicity of laboratories escaped the consciousness to obscure the vision of the whole? If all the dissimilarities is based on monetary values that Pharmacology has become? O supposedly generics are captive consumers? Or perhaps We buy marginal diseases, and then return to acquire greater chemical therapies? Simply the attitude of rethinking the situation implies a doubt about the social actions of the scene of the remedy, which encourages a systematic reversal in what has been achieved so far, as is challenged social concern for clinical disorders with the monetisation of the erudite solution, which discredits its effectiveness to the detriment of personal care. The particularity of having transformed into generic patients carries the tacit acceptance that the purchasing power of the wage – or income – has due suffer some genetic – or tax – ill, for which our science devoted his knowledge to provide the corresponding solution. Who created who? Generic drugs engendered a generic patient? Or vice versa? This whole situation speaks for itself of the only issue base that lack humanity invaded! Undoubtedly we have resumed the path of the reigns, where those who they have green dollar blood are able to heal themselves diving into scientific solutions, while the mob has authorization to consume marginalized potions previously authorized by tax collectors!.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Comments are closed.